| Assuming that it is valuable to move diversity
from a program to an asset, it is prudent to define what that means.
An asset is...something that has value, or provides an advantage.
Assets constitute the resources of the business.
If diversity is not an asset, what else could it be...a program,
an initiative, an expense? In the difficult and challenging business
environment that corporations are currently experiencing it is important
that all resources be leveraged to their maximum. It is also critical
that all resources/assets be of tactical and strategic value and
impact. Tactical resources will produce results in the near term,
while strategic assets will position the company for future, sustainable
success. In many cases, an asset is classified as either tactical
or strategic and is measured by a different set of criteria. It
is possible for a particular asset to be defined as tactical and
strategic, but the asset will need to withstand the rigors of passing
two different measurement standards.
One of the most profound statements on diversity came from a group
of former leaders of the United States military, filing a brief
with the Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan
Law School. The brief argued that a diverse officer corps is essential
to national security(1). In essence, they have deemed diversity
to be a critical asset. Obviously, if the military leaders have
determined that diversity is an asset, they do not want it eliminated.
Assets should be increased and their value maximized. |